This is contrary to common sense. The term “term” cannot be compatible with “mandatory”. It is an idea. The rules are not concrete by nature! But it is a law. And the punishment for breaking a real law is irreversible. Take, for example, God`s commandment in his garden: if Adam (which includes the woman who consists of flesh and bones, as recorded by Gen 2:23) eats the fruit (indefinite to be an apple) of a particular tree in that garden, he will surely die. He was a “flesh and bone” man (no reference to blood before eating the fruit of this tree), and of course to this day, no matter what you believe or do, you will surely die in the flesh triggered by blood contamination and its loss. It is a law, and it is immutable for everyone and for all those who have flesh and blood, even bones. But what about, say, the laws or laws of men? You (government officials) may or may not choose to be prosecuted for violating such fabricated laws (Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419, 455-465) (1793))) A so-called “police officer” may pass you for a traffic violation, but choose to quote him or not! Therefore, “rules and regulations” are not “mandatory” but discretionary.
Actual law enforcement is NOT discretionary. It is “mandatory”. And breaking the rules leads to punishment at a much gentler level. To make the concept of “rules” clearer, here is a detailed example: – “Rules” and “laws” are very similar concepts in terms of the objectives they follow. And in case of violation of any of the rules, there will also be sanctions of different kinds, based on the rule that was broken. Rules help us to learn, to prepare for life in society. As teenagers, we tend to learn that there are rules for beating, stealing, lying, and wasting. As young adults, we are held accountable for these rules by becoming law-abiding citizens. Laws are not supposed to set teaching limits, but are there to be enforced and are punishable by imprisonment and even death if broken.
If you`re old enough to face the law (aside from children who kill children), you`ve already learned the process by dealing with different sets of rules. These are some rules that are common in several institutions. Similarly, if you replace the educational institution with another association or partnership; and the director with a secretary, a president or a president, you will find other rules specific to the people and purpose of the group. For example, violation of the rules of an educational institution is likely to result in the payment of an amount in the form of a fine, the assignment of functions as responsibilities or, in extreme cases, suspension or hard work. So ask me a smart question or stop your pretentious psycho-chatter. Only a fool says to his heart, “There is no God. In fact, there are many gods. That`s all you love (duh!!!).
Both are terms that fall within the legal branch of the study. “Rules” and “laws” contribute to the proper functioning of a country. Some rules that are commonly found in academic institutions are: – interesting article, but I think it`s more than too detailed about individual rights when it comes to rules and/or laws, even those who have not commented on those who can do it or have done it in a fair way, Things like life nearby, but no cigar. There are no “layers of law”, sir! In fact, what did God say about such things through His Christ? Matthew 15:6-9: “. Thus, you have rendered God`s commandment ineffective through your tradition. You hypocrites, Esaias has prophesied to you by saying: This people approaches me with their mouth and honors me with their lips; But his heart is far from me. But in vain, they worship me and teach the commandments of men for the teachings. Therefore, man`s rules and regulations are not a “law”! Proposals that are wrongly presented as laws. In fact, a law does not change by the whims of the people. It is constant and immutable. But as you proclaim, like you, that the rules of man are the law in an inexplicable and indefinable way, simply because an oligarchic group of people (such as the Pharisees, scribes, and Sadducees), known as the legislature (composed of such men), goes through an artificial process known as “due process,” which is supposed to represent an idea of men (a law of law), which turns into law.
Totally misleading nonsense. God`s law is concrete and does not require any interpretation of persons, additions, or subtractions. You are blind to God`s truth. For they teach the commandments of men for the teachings! And who should the true “people of God” follow? Certainly not the “rule of law” that flows from people`s ideas; and certainly not in a “republican form of government”, according to which “the people” is the leader and not their “officials”! So learn the distinction between “law” and “rules of law” for this “man of perdition” (2 Thess. 2: ) “[think] of changing times and laws.” (Dan. 7:25). Stop living in the fictional world created by Satan, or stop defaming God`s name through your illicit comments. May God bless in truth and love. The courts play a key role in upholding the rule of law, particularly when hearing complaints from minority groups or persons representing minority views. Equality before the law is such an essential part of the U.S.
system of government that when a majority, intentionally or unintentionally, violates the rights of a minority, the court may deem it appropriate to hear both sides of the controversy in court. More than 200 years ago, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay published a series of essays in which they promoted the ratification of the United States Constitution, now known as the Federalist Papers. .